Ramble On

Wednesday, November 02, 2011

#11



Tim McCarver finally shows some lucidity: "How did this happen?" Joe Buck calling to echo his late great legendary father Jack's call of Kirby Puckett's Game 6 walkoff in 1991...what a Game...unbelievable...nearly a week later and I still have trouble believing that happened.

I've now had a few days to soak it all up, digest and reflect, and I've come to the conclusion: That was one of the greatest World Series' ever. The Cards and Rangers was supposed to be the Rangers power destroying the Cards, who were just supposed to be happy to have made it this far, and yet, it ended up being a very closely matched series.
From the first 2 games being so tight, and leaving STL split, to Pujols' Game 3 performance for the ages, to Game 6 (of which I think people will write books)where the Cards were down to their last strike in the 9th and 10th innings, came back from behind 5 different times, and local boy Freese came through twice to break the Rangers' spirits and force the first Game 7 since 2002. Game 7 was nearly anti-climactic, except that it was an exciting game too, with Freese yet again coming up clutch to tie all but sealing his MVP performance, and a 5th inning where the Cards scored 2 runs on 3 walks and 2 hit-by-pitches to go up by 3.
Of all the sports I watch, all the favourite teams, this is the team that is in my blood, and has been with me since I can remember. The Cards were in the World Series in 1982 (coincidentally against their now division-rival Brewers) and I was in St. Louis, visiting my grandparents, when according to them, I just became fascinated with the Series and the Cards, which no doubt thrilled my grandfather, who made sure to outfit me with Cards gear, including a 1982 Series Champs ballcap that I still have today, and a Stuffed Fredbird (the team mascot - who sat clutched in my hands for Game 6 and 7 this year - laugh if you want). Obviously I don't recall those days as I was 2, but I have clear recollection in 1987 of being in tears after Minnesota won Game 7, and suffering through the dry spell of the 90s with only 1996's NLCS loss to the Braves, coupled with Ozzie's retirement to make it worse.
There was just something this year, with Wainwright being out for the season, Pujols missing time with a broken hand, that I just wrote the season off early. But then I started to pay attention in late August and the math said they still could do it. That drive to the wildcard was epic, culminating in the fantastic Game 162 night where baseball witnessed the most amazing night in a long time. After that night, watching with my friend Neil, he said to me, that's amazing, but I don't think you'll get by Philly. I had to be realistic and agree, it didn't seem likely to beat the best team in baseball in the DS. But lo and behold...it all came down to Game 5, a pitching duel for the ages, between best friends, Cy Young winners, ex-Blue Jays Carpenter and Halladay. What a game that was...the NLCS was a blur, and then the Series.
But, here we are, Cards win World Series #11 in 2011, and I'm on such a high from it, the Rams could go 1-15 again this year and I wouldn't be phased; the Habs could miss the playoffs, I wouldn't worry. Because this year, the whole world got a dose of what I've been having for nearly 30 years : Cardinals Fever.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, August 22, 2011

RIP Jack...



To be honest, I cannot think of any time in my life that I've actually been affected/upset at the death of a politician. I think that speaks to Jack Layton's character, and that he was much more than a politician, which in my mind, had been a dirty word for nearly the last decade. I think it was that he came across very honestly, and more believeable than most in his field, and his convictions were strong. You sensed that he cared, even when he wasn't at work or there weren't media covering him.
Someone on the coverage today compared his 2011 campaign and fight with Cancer to another Canadian who we all celebrate every September: Terry Fox. He too made a courageous stand against the horrible disease, and Candians strive to uphold his wonderful example. I would venture that, maybe not today, but years from now, people will still be talking about Jack, and that he deserves a place amongst influential Canadian figures, who showed courage in the face of such a tough fight.
I don't want to speculate on the future of the NDP, but I have to echo Peter Mansbridge, who said that the NDP success this year really was because of Jack, and many voted for Jack, not necessarily the NDP. He was just such a likeable guy who seemed so sincere, and the positivity which he brought to the campaign this year made me so pleased, as opposed to the usual crap you have to deal with come election time.
My only Jack Layton story took place in the summer of 2008, I was working my first government contract in downtown Ottawa, and came in to work one morning, pushed the button for the elevator, waited, and when the doors popped open, who should walk out but Jack and a couple companions...he gave me a smile and kept on walking, but I remembered thinking at the time, how nice it was to get that smile, when I'm sure 99%of other people wouldn't have even noticed someone was there.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/08/22/pol-layton-last-letter.html

Of everything, I will miss your smile Jack, Rest in Peace, you will be missed.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, May 02, 2011

4 more years...

Well there it is...by the time Steven Harper comes up for review again, I'll be 35 years old.
Congrats to Jack Layton, but the Catch-22 is...you handed him Carte Blanche....
Iggy, you should have had the class to fall on your sword here, instead you're going to make them fire you...not cool.
No more Bloc? I'm OK with that.
Elizabeth May has a seat...that's nice...but what do you do with 1 seat?

I suppose time will tell.

Labels: ,

Friday, April 08, 2011

The Nature of Individuality (Real versus Contrived) on the Internet and beyond

So it's 2:30AM and I'm unable to sleep because I feel like I have ideas itching to get out of my head and onto some tangible format where I can read it/share with others. Please forgive the rambling if it gets to be too much. Or don't, in fact, since they're my thoughts, why do I feel a need to apologize for the fact that it may not be condensed into "tweet" length?

Ever since I was young, I was told I was an individual, and that being an individual was a valuable thing, to be guarded carefully and to be proud of. Yet I can't help but feel like the older I get, the more and more society is becoming homogeneous. Maybe it's globalization, or social networking, or pop culture, but I find that fewer and fewer people are individuals.

When I moved from elementary to "middle" school (I still call it Grade 7-8) only 1 other person from my elementary school went to the same place. It was a chance to "reinvent" myself, and yet, it just didn't work. I was still me, the same person I was before, and while I may have made a few concessions (giving up sweat pants and juice boxes) towards being less 'geeky', I don't think I changed who I was all that much (although in reality I probably was very different, but just nothing that I was consciously doing was in aid of being different or 'fitting in'). By no means was I the popular kid, but nor was I a huge dweeb and unpopular (though I probably was).

I managed to have my first few girlfriends (though a few weeks of 'dating' really doesn't seem like much in hindsight 15+ yrs later), hear a whole bunch of new music that I'd never been exposed to before, and learn a lot more about who I was, and how much I did (or in my case, didn't) care about what others thought of me. Of course there were times when something would happen and I'd wonder why some particular girl didn't like me (she probably liked me, but didn't like like me, a distinction I had trouble making up until my early 20s if I'm being completely honest), but for the most part, those times were few and far between.

The times when I felt like I didn't fit in were times when my parents were very helpful, and contrary to the usual way things go, I actually appreciated my parents quite a bit as a teenager (other than the need of my mother to make everything herself instead of buying it - a trait I now admire instead of mock - and of my father to try and get a deal instead of paying the full asking price - something I was once embarrassed by that I now try to emulate myself). They made it abundantly clear to me that I was unique, and that for the mostpart, if all the kids at school liked "x" and I liked "y" that was perfectly normal. Looking back, I think that may have been THE single most valuable thing they ever did for me.

Grade 7-8 came to a close, and onto High School, which wasn't such a big step since 7-8 had been in the actual high school, and practically on Queen's Campus. (It's true, from the start of Grade 7 until the end of 4th Year, my classes were in a 2 square block radius). Grade 9 had a few more attempts to fit in, or normalize, which were entirely useless at making me enjoy school any more at all. I had friends, and acquaintances, but the vast majority of the time, I simply went, did my best on the classwork, and was out the door as soon as possible.

It wasn't until Grade 10-11 that I finally felt like I was who I was, and there was no more need to try and be somebody else, or fit some kind of theoretical mold of what I was supposed to be like. I was there, I knew just about everyone by name, and maybe a little bit about most of the people, but somehow kind of floated between the groups and cliques. I knew some jocks, some nerds, some preps, (or whatever the KCVI equivalent was - Rowers I guess?) drama types, and so on. But I certainly never associated myself with one group over the others. I think it's because of this that I never had a problem being who I was, having my own opinions, expressing them, and being rather happy with who I was and feeling that I was rather self-aware.

Moving onto university, I was a fairly well formed version of who I am today, albeit with some major experiences along the way. In university I felt like I was who I was, and wasn't trying to be anyone else. That isn't to say that sometimes I followed what someone else did, or thought 'hey I'm going to do what he's doing', but for the mostpart, I think I stuck to my own individuality. Obviously some moments of self-doubt and insecurity crept in, but most of the time, I'd talk it out with friends or just realise, I didn't give a flying fuck what someone thought of me if they didn't like me or had a completely skewed sense of who I was.

By the time graduation rolled along, I was confident in the person I was, and while there have been shifts and changes along the way, the person from then strongly resembles the one who's writing this manifesto of whatever it is.

The only time I really succumbed to the self-doubt and loss of assuredness was once I got onto Facebook. All of a sudden I was adding people to my list just because I knew them briefly, or went to school with them at some point, or had had interactions with them. I found myself wanting people to know who I knew, what I had done, what I thought was cool, and all the rest of it.

Wait a minute...something's wrong here...why do I care what someone who I had Grade 10 Geography with thinks of my friend list or my choice in Movies or Music?
Why am I feeling lowered self worth or need for reassurance when someone from Elementary school or camp doesn't respond to my message or wall post?
Why am I doing stupid quizzes and hoping that my answer makes me cooler in the eyes of someone I never had more than 15 minutes conversation with in 5 years of High School or 4 years of university?

It amazed me how in the span of 6 weeks I'd gone from not even having facebook, to letting it have such an impact on me. If someone disagreed with something I said or wrote or took it out of context, I'd be sad or upset and it would linger. I had a list of "Friends" that was nearing 300 people, yet the number I'd been out for a drink with or had a meaningful conversation with was a fraction of that number. I found myself doing things like not putting a movie on my favourites list because someone might see it and think I was a loser or something. Or writing a reply to someone's posting on something, and then editing it to sound better (something which exists in all online interactions I believe, from email to IM to chatting, to social networking).

I wasn't aware of it at first, but then it started to dawn on me...Facebook had taken me back to Grade 7-9! I was trying to get approval from people who I thought needed to like me...yet they were supposedly "friends", and of course your friends like you regardless. Something was seriously wrong with this...I think I'd have been much happier calling the 300 on my list "acquaintances" with a smaller portion as "friends". I was always someone who believed that having a few close very good friends was far more important than having a bunch of casual friends. Those were acquaintances to me; the people in High School I knew, and would say hi to, but wouldn't go camping with or out for a pint with. The friends were fewer in number but much more important. I had to remember, not everyone was going to be your best friend, and someone you were close with in grade 5 or 11 was someone you might not know at all now, or even like.

Eventually I realized what I had done, devolving into a teenaged mindset, seeking approval unknowingly from all these people, some of whom I barely knew. That's when I thought forget this, I don't care what 280 or so people think of me, I'm me and that's that. I went through my list with a heavy hand on the delete button, and after the initial feeling of worth from having so many "friends" dissipated, I felt better getting rid of people from that list that I didn't communicate with, or particularly like, or want to get to know, or have anything in common with anymore (or hadn't had at any time).

Now I have no problem posting what I want and not giving a shit what anyone thinks of it. I have to live with me, so if I'm good with me, and it's not hurting anyone else, then great.

But here's the problem: I don't think what I experienced is uncommon. I think this is much more common a problem than people may be aware of. I was also fortunate in not having to deal with facebook until I was 27 years old. I cannot imagine what it must be like for kids growing up trying to find their own unique identities while being on a facebook or twitter or some other online site. I think as humans we all have a desire to be liked by as many people as possible, and we might do things to be more liked that aren't exactly in tune with who we really are as people.

I know much has been written about this, and I think it's agreed upon that many people construct the individual that they want others to think they are, or that they think others will like. This may be OK with teeny things (like not admitting you love My Little Pony or something) but can be dangerous when you deny who you really are, or have to live your life according to a character (or caricature I should say) you've created of yourself. I should also be clear, that when it comes to the majority, I'm lucky enough to have been encouraged to be myself, the unique individual I am, and not everyone is that lucky or fortunate; nor do people have belief in themselves, and many struggle their whole lives with the problem.

I also think it might be easier for me to avoid that, or be aware of it, because I feel I have a very good knowledge of the self, and know when I'm not being true to who I am. It also helps a bunch that I don't respect social convention on many accounts, and feel that tact can be a hinderance, rather than a helpful guide in life. (this may also explain some of the issues I've come up against, but that's OK, I made my tactless bed, and I have to sleep in it).

So, summing up I suppose, I'm going to continue to make a concerted effort to be Gavin, the real one who people know, and not some constructed, idealized version of myself. I do like some really shitty movies, I do think a lot of people are assholes, and I do have a realist (some say pessimist) outlook many days. But I'm also very happy with who I am, I'm happy with the life I lead (I'd love a bit more $$ but then again, who wouldn't? If only for the freedom it offers) and I don't feel the need to justify myself to anyone. Therefore, I guess I don't need to expound on whether or not having a blog is egotistical, lame, or completely normal, and simply a great outlet for writing, which I wouldn't otherwise have.

So finally, that's up to you, to decide if you want to read this, if you want to comment on it, if it will change your opinion of me, one way or another, or whatever. All I know is, I'm glad that I figured out what I was doing before it became a huge problem, and I hope other people are self-aware enough to notice if it's becoming/is an issue for them.

And if you made it this far, I promise the next entry will be something about music. Because I like music and writing about music far more than this rambling garbage, but I had to get it out of my system and I'll be curious to see if anyone feels similarly ( but I won't change my opinion even if no one does).

Until next time, Gavin will Return in: Thunderball.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 17, 2011

St. Patrick's Day, or there's more to Ireland than Green Beer and Leprechauns.


Growing up, my best friend's birthday was on March 17th. This meant little to me until I hit high school and realized that there was the coinciding day of St. Patrick where everyone in the world seemed to get shitfaced. Frankly, he thought it was great cause there'd be no way he'd be singled out for drinking in the middle of the week. As I got older though, I realized how utterly stupid it is for a nation's most important day (in Ireland it's a National Holiday and actually means more than green beer, shamrock shakes and puking on a leprechaun) to be an excuse for everyone to get fucked up. If anything, I take St. Patrick's Day as an excuse to play the Dropkick Murphys and the Pogues really loud. Sure they may sound great drunk, but that doesn't mean I get in touch with my inner Irishman today. I could if I wanted, as I my grandmother's grandmother was Irish (which would make me 6.25% Irish, assuming she was full blooded Irish and not just Irish-American) but that's another point. I see people from almost every walk of life and group getting in on the shenanigans, but if you asked them who St. Patrick was and what he did they'd probably say something stupid like "he invented Green Beer". It seems to be the only time it happens, as I don't see people going apeshit and having haggis and getting drunk on St. Andrew's Day for being Scottish (though I could do that as I'm about 50% Scotish) and I've not yet been invited to a Jamaican Independence Day party for Jamaican Patties and a fat blunt, nor do most people I know have 4th of July parties (in this country at least). So it begs the question: Why do so many people want to identify with the Irish on their national day? Instead of being a celebration of Ireland and the Irish culture, it seems to be making a mockery of the Irish and everyone gets to act out whatever stereotypical caricature they think the Irish are. Green and Beer and Shamrocks and talking about Leprechauns and Lucky Charms.
Here's an idea, if you're so gung ho on the Irish culture (which I doubt the majority of revelers are) then how about trying to actually LEARN about it, or go meet some actual Irish people and ask what it means to them. God forbid you might actually learn something about another culture instead of just reinforcing negative stereotypes and belittling a culture.

An Modh Foshuiteach Láith

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Stan the Man and his hopeful successor.


To the left is a picture of the greatest St. Louis Cardinal of all time. In the nearly 110 years of this team, there have been great players for sure, but if you're asked about the Cardinals, anyone over 30 can tell you 1 name: Stan Musial. The Man played 22 seasons, from 1941 to 1963, was selected to an all-time record of 24 All-Star Games (tied with Willie Mays), was a 3-time National League MVP, and won 3 World Series titles, all in the Gateway City.



There were good players on the Cards before him, some great, some hall of famers (Rogers Hornsby, Dizzy Dean), and the same afterwards (Bob Gibson, Lou Brock, Ozzie Smith), but no one who really deserved to be in the same rarefied air. (This being written by a boy who grew up LOVING Ozzie Smith, but knows Stan the Man was more than just a nickname.)

Just yesterday, Stan was presented with the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Barack Obama, at the ripe old age of 90. (seen above seated next to another class act, Bill Russell) Stan held 17 MLB records upon his retirement, but more remarkable than that was that in 3026 appearances, he was never once ejected from a game.

In 1968, a statue of Musial was erected at Busch Stadium, with the following inscription:

"Here stands baseball's perfect warrior. Here stands baseball's perfect knight."

The greatest Cardinal of all time.

It would be nearly 40 years after Musial's retirement before a worthy successor would appear...

Albert Pujols debuted with the Cardinals on Opening Day 2001 (nearly 60 years since Musial debuted [2nd half of a doubleheader on Sept. 17th 1941]), hitting a Home Run and never looking back. Named an All-Star his first year, winning NL Rookie of the Year, Pujols just got better. In his 10 seasons with the Cardinals, he's a 9-time All-Star, 6-Time Silver Slugger, 2-Time Gold Glover at 1st (though he started off in the OF, and moved to 1st Base, much like Musial before him), and, like Musial, a 3-Time NL MVP. In 2004, he helped lead the Cardinals to the World Series, where the lost to the Red Sox (asterisk needed, as God was on Boston's side that season). In 2006, the NEW New Busch Stadium opened up [note: Sportsman's Park was later named Busch Stadium when the Busch family bought the Cardinals, and then Busch Stadium was opened in 1966, so the current Busch Stadium is the 3rd Cardinals Stadium to be called Busch] and Pujols was the first Cardinal to Homer in their new Stadium. That same year Albert lead them to their first World Series in 24 years. This was my 2nd time seeing them win it all, though I had also seen the losses in 1985, 1987, and, as mentioned above, in 2004.

Today the day after Stan received his Presidential Medal of Freedom, the Cardinals and Albert failed to agree on a new contract. This whole preamble has pretty much been to make the case that Albert Pujols is as instrumental to the Cardinals now as Stan Musial was then, if not more so. Give Albert whatever he wants, he's the best player in the world right now, and no less than Sports Illustrated named him MLB player of the Decade for the 2000s. He should be able to cement his legacy and join Stan the Man in the Hall of Fame as the Greatest life-long Cardinals of All-Time. Let #5's Jersey be retired alongside his predecessor #6, and all will be right in Redbird land.

If this doesn't happen, then it will be tragic. Horrible. Awful. Please don't make 2011 the last time we see Pujols in the Red and White...

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, February 12, 2011

50 Years Ago Today!!!

Today's Musical Birthdays:

50 years ago today! Henry Rollins.

1919: Tennessee Ernie Ford

1944: Peter Tork - The Monkees

1950: Peter Gabriel

1956: Peter Hook - Joy Division/New Order

1966: Freedom Williams - C + C Music Factory....ugh.

1974: Robbie Williams - Double Ugh.

1976: Leslie Feist

OK...2 days, I have to say I don't think I'm going to do this every day...I think it's going to get boring. Agreed? Or maybe just pick one for the day?

Labels: , ,

Friday, February 11, 2011

February 11th in Music History


50 Years ago today, Shop Around by The Miracles became Motown's first million-selling single, as well as the first #1 for the label on the Billboard R&B Charts. The song also hit #2 on the Billboard Hot 100, and is so old, they were still called the Miracles, and not 'Smokey Robinson and the Miracles'. Who doesn't love Smokey?





In 1942, the first ever Gold Record was given to Glenn Miller for Chattanooga Choo Choo.

In 1972, Al Green had his only #1 Hit in the US with Let's Stay Together. That's got to be some sort of crime...Al Green is fantastic...only Hit #1 once???
In 1977, The Police recorded their first single: Fall Out at Pathway Studios in London. I can honestly say I've never heard it...
In 1994, Alice in Chains entered the US Album Charts at #1 with Jar of Flies which I remember, although I happen to think Dirt was way better. I also remember first getting into Alice in Chains when my dad and brother came home from St. Louis, and Al - my brother - had 2 new cassette tapes (yes, that's right, look it up if you're under 25) from Alice in Chains (Facelift and the aforementioned Dirt) which he had mistakenly purchased thinking they were Alice Cooper albums. Seeing as how he was probably 8yrs old at the time, it was one of the happier accidents we had musically growing up. (He was into Alice Cooper because of Wayne's World, which was also the first movie I ever bought myself (on VHS no less [look that one up too young'ns], from Jumbo Video in Kingston, which I remember advertising that they had 250 copies available).
In 1995, Van Halen had their first US #1 Album: Balance. Seriously? That's insane, for a number of reasons: 1) It was Van Hagar; 2) The songs on that album suck balls; 3) The cover is ridiculous. It's no surprise that this was the last full album to feature Sammy Hagar, and that after the release of this, Van Halen had to put out a Greatest Hits album to remind people they weren't complete shit.
In 1997, U2 announces their upcoming PopMart World Tour from a Kmart in Greenwich Village. I definitely recall seeing this on Much Music and thinking "What the fuck?" At the same time, David Bowie was receiving a Star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.
In 2003, The Doors drummer John Densmore sued former bandmates Ray Manzarek and Robby Krieger for starting up a new version of the Doors with drummer Stewart Copeland (of the Police - again) and vocalist Ian Astbury (the Cult) saying that anything not featuring Jim Morrison shouldn't be called The Doors. Sadly, this didn't occur in time to prevent Creed from covering Riders on the Storm in 2000.
In 2005, Cotswold Rail named a diesel train after late Clash frontman Joe Stummer. So British, yet still very cool in an odd way.
In 2007, 30 years after recording their first single, Sting announces that The Police are getting back together. Wow, talk about Synchronicity...(hehehe)
Notable births: 1939: Ray Manzarek, Keyboardist - The Doors (again w/ him)
1945: Joe Schermie, Bassist - Three Dog Night
1952: Michael McDonald, Keyboardist/Vocals - Steely Dan/The Doobie Brothers (It should be said that Michael McDonald is the Sammy Hagar of the Doobies. When he showed up, they started to suck balls and write crap. Without him, we'd also be missing one of the funniest gags in The 40-Year Old Virgin)
1950: Steve Hackett, Guitarist - Genesis
1968: Chynna Phillips - Wilson Phillips (Did you know? Wilson Phillips is the Bad Karma sent by the universe to balance against the awesomeness of The Beach Boys and the Mamas & the Papas)
That's it for today in music history, hopefully this was informative and entertaining, and you don't want a refund...

Labels: , ,

This Day in Music History

I've decided that the best way to have content on here is to ensure there's something new every day, even if it's nothing specifically related to me or that I've done.
So I launch the helpful feature of letting you, my loyal reader, (no not a typo) know what happened today in the history of popular music.

I hope this proves interesting or sparks conversation; enjoy!

Labels: , ,